[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLC4X-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17155550#comment-17155550
 ] 

Christofer Dutz commented on PLC4X-210:
---------------------------------------

It turns out I was creating a KNX Tunnel-Busmonitor connection as I was using 
the ETS5 Busmonitor to create the first version of the KNX driver. In this mode 
all data on the bus seems to be transported (Possibly also corrupt packages). I 
changed the driver to be more robust against such failures, but switched it to 
use a Tunnnel Link-Layer connection instead. This has the benefit of making the 
client a full member of the KNX bus and it seems to eliminate the problems due 
to corrupt packages on the bus.

> [KNX] When running a KNX Tunneling Subscription for a longer time there are 
> packets that kill the connection
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PLC4X-210
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLC4X-210
>             Project: Apache PLC4X
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Driver-KNX
>    Affects Versions: 0.7.0, 0.8.0
>            Reporter: Christofer Dutz
>            Assignee: Christofer Dutz
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>
> Every now and then comes a packet, the driver seems to be unable to process. 
> In this case the driver just dies. It seems the gateway is expecting some 
> sort of response and after not getting it, it cancels the connection.
>  
> Luckily the driver outputs the package he was not able to decode:
> {code:java}
> 0610042000180404ce00 2b0703010404025002 bab8b838bb
> 061004200018047ddf00 2b0703010404020702 9f9c9c9cdc
> 0610042000180401c200 2b0703010304025601 bab8b838bb
> {code}
> It looks as if these messages are too short (they actually end after the 
> expected targetAddress however the decoded source and destination address 
> seem garbled, so I would assume something's not quite correct here.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to