[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLC4X-252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17218971#comment-17218971
]
Christofer Dutz commented on PLC4X-252:
---------------------------------------
How would you avoid passing in a Modbus field to a S7 connection in this case?
> Provide read and write builder method variants with supplied PlcField
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PLC4X-252
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLC4X-252
> Project: Apache PLC4X
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: API
> Affects Versions: 0.8.0
> Reporter: Łukasz Dywicki
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>
> At the present each operation involving driver requires construction of a
> field "query string". While it permits implementers rely on generic field
> syntax it also has downsides - it won't capture changes in how fields are
> constructed.
> For that reason we would like to introduce a second option for specifying
> field queries which would permit passing of `PlcField` instances directly.
> {code:lang=java|title=PlcWriteRequest.Builder.java}
> PlcWriteRequest.Builder addItem(String name, String fieldQuery,
> Boolean... values);
> {code}
> would receive second option
> {code:lang=java|title=PlcWriteRequest.Builder.java}
> PlcWriteRequest.Builder addItem(String name, PlcField fieldQuery,
> Boolean... values);
> {code}
> for all possible combinations of write calls.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
