chenjian2664 commented on PR #573: URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/573#issuecomment-2556392001
@adutra Thanks for the reply. > I think that instead we should assume that in all Polaris code, parameters and return types are non-null by default In this case, explicit check would make code more safe just as @flyrain mentioned. > and only annotate the nullable ones. The current code base seems do the both the explicit check for null and nonnull in most places -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
