eric-maynard commented on PR #1913: URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1913#issuecomment-2989645376
I took a quick look -- pooling the STS clients seems like a reasonable thing to do and this approach to doing so looks pretty correct to me. However it's not totally clear to me why this is needed to implement #32. Looking at #389, this part of the code wasn't touched at all. Could we instead start more top-down with S3-compatible storage support and figure out if these changes are actually necessary? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@polaris.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
