binarycat0 opened a new issue, #2488: URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/2488
Thanks for the perf. update @binarycat0 ! However, the execution times are too small and the sample size is small too (I'm afraid) so the perf. numbers are not decisive, IMHO :sweat_smile: At the same time the new index will have some storage and maintenance overhead. Let's open a `dev` ML discussion about this and see what people who use Polaris with Postgres think. The java code changes LGTM :+1: _Originally posted by @dimas-b in https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/2465#issuecomment-3245776381_ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@polaris.apache.org.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
