dimas-b commented on code in PR #3826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/3826#discussion_r2934069848
##########
spec/polaris-catalog-apis/generic-tables-api.yaml:
##########
@@ -256,6 +264,52 @@ components:
items:
$ref:
'../iceberg-rest-catalog-open-api.yaml#/components/schemas/TableIdentifier'
+
+ StorageAccessConfig:
+ type: object
+ required:
+ - prefix
+ - config
+ properties:
+ prefix:
+ type: string
+ description: Indicates a storage location prefix where the
configuration is relevant. Clients should choose the most
+ specific prefix (by selecting the longest common prefix) if
several configurations of the same type are available.
+ If multiple configurations share the same longest matching prefix,
the client may select any of them. However,
+ a well-designed server should avoid generating multiple
configurations for the same prefix.
Review Comment:
Note: this update was made after the VOTE on `dev`:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/n8nfccb61zb2gy3ktpw8rbrt2yoryo4c
I do not mind this specific change, but what is the point of calling a
formal vote if changes are interleaved with the voting process? A vote is
supposed to to approve a specific change. How do we know the votes cast before
an update to the PR are still relevant and their authors do not want to
reconsider?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
