snazy commented on code in PR #4433: URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/4433#discussion_r3244208977
########## SECURITY-THREAT-MODEL.md: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,730 @@ +<!-- + Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + distributed with this work for additional information + regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + + Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, + software distributed under the License is distributed on an + "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY + KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the + specific language governing permissions and limitations + under the License. +--> + +# Apache Polaris Threat Model + +## Purpose + +This document defines the security boundaries for Apache Polaris. It is intended +to guide maintainers, security reviewers, and automated analysis tools when +evaluating potential vulnerabilities. + +Use this document to decide whether a finding affects a protected Polaris asset, +crosses a Polaris trust boundary, violates a Polaris security invariant, and +should be handled as a Polaris security issue. + +This document is guidance for analysis and triage. It does not make policy +decisions, accept or reject vulnerability reports, assign ASF severity, allocate +CVEs, or determine disclosure handling. Human project and ASF security review is +required for those decisions. + +## Scope + +Apache Polaris is a catalog service for managing Apache Iceberg catalogs, +namespaces, tables, views, principals, roles, policies, and related metadata. + +This threat model covers: + +- Polaris server and runtime components. +- REST APIs exposed by Polaris. +- Authentication and authorization behavior. +- Catalog metadata access and mutation. +- Persistence-layer interactions. +- Integration points with storage, catalog, policy, and identity backends where + Polaris makes authentication, authorization, or trust decisions. + +This threat model does not cover: + +- Vulnerabilities in client applications using Polaris incorrectly. +- Compromise of the underlying database, object store, identity provider, + container platform, host operating system, or deployment platform. +- Denial of service caused solely by insufficient infrastructure sizing. +- Bugs in third-party dependencies unless Polaris exposes them through unsafe + configuration or usage. + +## Component Families + +Polaris has several component families with different entry points, deployment +models, and trust boundaries: + +| Component family | Representative entry points | Deployment model | Threat-model scope | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Polaris server and runtime | Management APIs, catalog APIs, service runtime | Long-running service | In scope for authentication, authorization, metadata, persistence, storage, policy, and credential-handling decisions. | +| Polaris admin tool | Administrative CLI commands and generated local profiles | Operator tool | In scope when handling credentials, configuration, administration, logs, or generated artifacts. | +| Python CLI under `client/` | Client commands, local configuration, command output | User or operator CLI | In scope when handling credentials, tokens, catalog metadata, local profiles, logs, or generated artifacts. | Review Comment: good point about potential agent slowdown, fixed -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
