snazy commented on PR #4705: URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/4705#issuecomment-4767809391
I am not convinced this should merge before we know which implementation contract it is serving. A core lineage query/service model without a working implementation risks freezing API concepts before we have validated the actual persistence/query semantics. In particular, the local-store discussion is still open around reduced graph semantics, “latest” edge replacement, auth-filtered reads, and backend capability boundaries. If this PR is intended only as neutral scaffolding, I think it should be very explicit about what is not being committed here, and avoid introducing model/API shapes that later persistence PRs depend on as settled. Otherwise we should probably review this together with the first implementation that proves the model is sufficient. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
