[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsz-wo Sze updated RATIS-1945:
------------------------------
Description:
HDDS-9784 reported performance degradation even if the min-wait time (added by
RATIS-1793) is set to 1ms. -It may be better to enforce the min-wait time only
INCONSISTENCY replies.- (see the update below)
(Update) After checked the code, found that RATIS-1836 added error retry
policy. INCONSISTENCY replies should be counted as errors. Then, retry policy
will delay the retries and the min-wait time can be set as 0ms in order to
avoid performance penalty for the non-error case.
was:HDDS-9784 reported performance degradation even if the min-wait time
(added by RATIS-1793) is set to 1ms. It may be better to enforce the min-wait
time only INCONSISTENCY replies.
Summary: INCONSISTENCY replies should be counted as errors. (was:
Enforce min wait time only for INCONSISTENCY replies)
> INCONSISTENCY replies should be counted as errors.
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RATIS-1945
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1945
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: gRPC
> Reporter: Tsz-wo Sze
> Assignee: Tsz-wo Sze
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> HDDS-9784 reported performance degradation even if the min-wait time (added
> by RATIS-1793) is set to 1ms. -It may be better to enforce the min-wait time
> only INCONSISTENCY replies.- (see the update below)
> (Update) After checked the code, found that RATIS-1836 added error retry
> policy. INCONSISTENCY replies should be counted as errors. Then, retry policy
> will delay the retries and the min-wait time can be set as 0ms in order to
> avoid performance penalty for the non-error case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
