[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-2296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tsz-wo Sze updated RATIS-2296:
------------------------------
    Description: 
Setting the Raft group size to an even number for HA does not make sense.  As 
an example, support group size is 4.  It only can tolerate 1 failure, which is 
the same as group size 3.  However, It is harder to get the majority comparing 
to group size 3 -- it requires 3 instead of 2.  

We should just fail it when setting a Raft group to an even number.  This is a 
configurable feature

  was:
Setting the Raft group size to an even number for HA does not make sense.  As 
an example, support group size is 4.  It only can tolerate 1 failure, which is 
the same as group size 3.  However, It is harder to get the majority comparing 
to group size 3 -- it requires 3 instead of 2.  

We should just fail it when setting a Raft group to an even number.

        Summary: Disallow setting Raft group size to an even number  (was: SCM 
and OM should not allow changing Raft group size to an even number)

[~ivanandika], let's move this to Ratis and make it configurable.

> Disallow setting Raft group size to an even number
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RATIS-2296
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-2296
>             Project: Ratis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: raft-group
>            Reporter: Tsz-wo Sze
>            Assignee: Tsz-wo Sze
>            Priority: Major
>
> Setting the Raft group size to an even number for HA does not make sense.  As 
> an example, support group size is 4.  It only can tolerate 1 failure, which 
> is the same as group size 3.  However, It is harder to get the majority 
> comparing to group size 3 -- it requires 3 instead of 2.  
> We should just fail it when setting a Raft group to an even number.  This is 
> a configurable feature



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to