[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16518721#comment-16518721
 ] 

Elek, Marton commented on RATIS-248:
------------------------------------

I think the BSD license was missing. We need an offline instance from the 
license it's not enough to link it in the header. But I added it as part of the 
RATIS-249.

> Fix BSD licensing issue related to crc32 code
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RATIS-248
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-248
>             Project: Ratis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Elek, Marton
>            Assignee: Sandeep Nemuri
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> Thanks to [~jmclean], how reported this issue during the ratis 0.2.0 rc1 vote.
> {quote}- LICENSE is missing a BSD license
> LICENSE is missing BSD license for these files [2][3][4]. Note that a 
> condition of the BSD license is to include it’s text, the text is missing 
> form the headers and not included in LICENSE.
> 2. 
> /ratis-incubator-0.2.0/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/util/PureJavaCrc32C.java
> 3. 
> /ratis-incubator-0.2.0/ratis-common/src/main/native/src/org/apache/ratis/util/bulk_crc32.c
> 4. 
> /ratis-incubator-0.2.0/ratis-common/src/main/native/src/org/apache/ratis/util/bulk_crc32_x86.c
> From what I can see for the source release LICENSE should be boiler place and 
> include the BSD license mentioned above and nothing else, NOTICE should be 
> boilerplate and a few lines long{quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to