[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16901472#comment-16901472
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on RATIS-654:
-------------------------------------------
Hi [[email protected]], really appreciated that you work on this.
> ... copied the resource-bundle created by HBase , ...
HBase is a much bigger project compared to Ratis. I wonder if we would include
a lot of unnecessary dependencies.
BTW, we should make Ratis not depending on Hadoop (or at least an option) since
# Hadoop has a huge dependency tree. It unnecessarily taxes the users who are
not using ratis-hadoop (i.e. hadoop rpc).
# The ratis-hadoop module is not well maintained. Even the unit tests may fail.
> Fix generation LICENSE and NOTICE for third-party dependencies
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RATIS-654
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-654
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
> Reporter: Ankit Singhal
> Assignee: Ankit Singhal
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: RATIS-654.patch
>
>
> Details on licenses, what can be bundled and what can't be as per apache:-
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
> Below is the guide on how a dev should be assembling LICENSE and NOTICE:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
> We need to include LICENSE and NOTICE for transitive dependencies as well
> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps-of-deps
> The supplemental model[s1] of maven can help in supplementing missing
> information of LICENSE and NOTICE in the third-party dependencies in our
> bundled LICENSE and NOTICE
> [1]
> https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/supplemental-models.html
> Here, I have copied the resource-bundle created by HBase , so that we don't
> need to re-write whole logic of generating LICENSE and NOTICE in apache way.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
