[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17086870#comment-17086870
]
Hadoop QA commented on RATIS-840:
---------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
36s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Findbugs executables are not available. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m
53s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
54s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
19s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
59s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 35m 39s{color}
| {color:red} root in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
19s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 46m 22s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | ratis.logservice.TestLogServiceWithNetty |
| | ratis.logservice.TestLogServiceWithGrpc |
| | ratis.logservice.server.TestMetaServer |
| | ratis.grpc.TestServerRestartWithGrpc |
| | ratis.grpc.TestRaftStateMachineExceptionWithGrpc |
| | ratis.grpc.TestRaftServerWithGrpc |
| | ratis.netty.TestRaftReconfigurationWithNetty |
| | ratis.server.simulation.TestRaftStateMachineExceptionWithSimulatedRpc |
| | ratis.server.simulation.TestLeaderElectionWithSimulatedRpc |
| | ratis.netty.TestRaftSnapshotWithNetty |
| | ratis.grpc.TestRaftSnapshotWithGrpc |
| | ratis.server.simulation.TestRaftSnapshotWithSimulatedRpc |
| | ratis.server.simulation.TestRetryCacheWithSimulatedRpc |
| | ratis.server.simulation.TestRaftWithSimulatedRpc |
| | ratis.examples.filestore.TestFileStoreWithGrpc |
| | ratis.examples.arithmetic.TestArithmeticLogDump |
| | ratis.examples.filestore.TestFileStoreWithNetty |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.8 Server=19.03.8 Image:yetus/ratis:date2020-04-19 |
| JIRA Issue | RATIS-840 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13000408/RATIS-840.001.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit findbugs
checkstyle compile |
| uname | Linux 64fe0f50466b 4.15.0-74-generic #84-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 19
08:06:28 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-RATIS-Build/yetus-personality.sh
|
| git revision | master / 9752b5a |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.6.3
(cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f) |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_242 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-RATIS-Build/1290/artifact/out/patch-unit-root.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-RATIS-Build/1290/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 1133 (vs. ulimit of 5000) |
| modules | C: ratis-server U: ratis-server |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-RATIS-Build/1290/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Memory leak of LogAppender
> --------------------------
>
> Key: RATIS-840
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-840
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: server
> Reporter: runzhiwang
> Assignee: runzhiwang
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: RATIS-840.001.patch, image-2020-04-06-14-27-28-485.png,
> image-2020-04-06-14-27-39-582.png, screenshot-1.png, screenshot-2.png
>
>
> *What's the problem ?*
> When run hadoop-ozone for 4 days, datanode memory leak. When dump heap, I
> found there are 460710 instances of GrpcLogAppender. But there are only 6
> instances of SenderList, and each SenderList contains 1-2 instance of
> GrpcLogAppender. And there are a lot of logs related to
> [LeaderState::restartSender|https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/blob/master/ratis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/LeaderState.java#L428].
> {code:java}INFO impl.RaftServerImpl:
> 1665f5ea-ab17-4a0e-af6d-6958efd322fa@group-F64B465F37B5-LeaderState:
> Restarting GrpcLogAppender for
> 1665f5ea-ab17-4a0e-af6d-6958efd322fa@group-F64B465F37B5-\u003e229cbcc1-a3b2-4383-9c0d-c0f4c28c3d4a\n","stream":"stderr","time":"2020-04-06T03:59:53.37892512Z"}{code}
>
> So there are a lot of GrpcLogAppender did not stop the Daemon Thread when
> removed from senders.
> !image-2020-04-06-14-27-28-485.png!
> !image-2020-04-06-14-27-39-582.png!
>
> *Why
> [LeaderState::restartSender|https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/blob/master/ratis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/LeaderState.java#L428]
> so many times ?*
> 1. As the image shows, when remove group, SegmentedRaftLog will close, then
> GrpcLogAppender throw exception when find the SegmentedRaftLog was closed.
> Then GrpcLogAppender will be
> [restarted|https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/blob/master/ratis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/LogAppender.java#L94],
> and the new GrpcLogAppender throw exception again when find the
> SegmentedRaftLog was closed, then GrpcLogAppender will be restarted again ...
> . It results in an infinite restart of GrpcLogAppender.
> 2. Actually, when remove group, GrpcLogAppender will be stoped:
> RaftServerImpl::shutdown ->
> [RoleInfo::shutdownLeaderState|https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/blob/master/ratis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/RaftServerImpl.java#L266]
> -> LeaderState::stop -> LogAppender::stopAppender, then SegmentedRaftLog
> will be closed: RaftServerImpl::shutdown ->
> [ServerState:close|https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/blob/master/ratis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/RaftServerImpl.java#L271]
> ... . Though RoleInfo::shutdownLeaderState called before ServerState:close,
> but the GrpcLogAppender was stopped asynchronously. So infinite restart of
> GrpcLogAppender happens, when GrpcLogAppender stop after SegmentedRaftLog
> close.
> !screenshot-1.png!
> *Why GrpcLogAppender did not stop the Daemon Thread when removed from senders
> ?*
> I find a lot of GrpcLogAppender blocked inside logs4j. I think it's
> GrpcLogAppender restart too fast, then blocked in logs4j.
> !screenshot-2.png!
> *Can the new GrpcLogAppender work normally ?*
> 1. Even though without the above problem, the new created GrpcLogAppender
> still can not work normally.
> 2. When creat a new GrpcLogAppender, a new FollowerInfo will also be created:
> LeaderState::addAndStartSenders ->
> LeaderState::addSenders->RaftServerImpl::newLogAppender -> [new
> FollowerInfo|https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/blob/master/ratis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/RaftServerImpl.java#L129]
> 3. When the new created GrpcLogAppender append entry to follower, then the
> follower response SUCCESS.
> 4. Then LeaderState::updateCommit -> [LeaderState::getMajorityMin |
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/blob/master/ratis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/LeaderState.java#L599]
> ->
> [voterLists.get(0) |
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/blob/master/ratis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/LeaderState.java#L607].
> {color:#DE350B}Error happens because voterLists.get(0) return the
> FollowerInfo of the old GrpcLogAppender, not the FollowerInfo of the new
> GrpcLogAppender. {color}
> 5. Because the majority commit got from the FollowerInfo of the old
> GrpcLogAppender never changes. So even though follower has append entry
> successfully, the leader can not update commit. So the new created
> GrpcLogAppender can never work normally.
> 6. The reason of unit test of runTestRestartLogAppender can pass is that it
> did not stop the old GrpcLogAppender, and the old GrpcLogAppender append
> entry to follower, not the new GrpcLogAppender. If stop the old
> GrpcLogAppender, runTestRestartLogAppender will fail.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
