[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Glen Geng updated RATIS-1001:
-----------------------------
Labels: (was: pull-request-available)
> CLONE - shouldWithholdVotes() should be triggered for handling higher term
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RATIS-1001
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1001
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: server
> Reporter: Glen Geng
> Assignee: Glen Geng
> Priority: Major
>
>
> I assume that {{shouldWithholdVotes()}} is used to handle request vote
> request with higher candidate term from disruptive server, but currently it
> just ignored such requests, since it only take effect when
> {{(state.getCurrentTerm() >= candidateTerm)}} .
> shouldWithholdVotes() should be triggered for handling higher term. If
> currentTerm is larger or equal to candidateTerm, just reject the request
> vote, no need further handling.
>
> Current code is
> {code:java}
> private boolean shouldWithholdVotes(long candidateTerm) {
> if (state.getCurrentTerm() < candidateTerm) {
> return false;
> } else if (isLeader()) {
> return true;
> } else {
> // following a leader and not yet timeout
> return isFollower() && state.hasLeader()
> &&
> role.getFollowerState().map(FollowerState::shouldWithholdVotes).orElse(false);
> }
> }
> {code}
> Modify to
> {code:java}
> private boolean shouldWithholdVotes(long candidateTerm) {
> if (state.getCurrentTerm() >= candidateTerm) {
> return false;
> } else if (isLeader()) {
> return true;
> } else {
> // following a leader and not yet timeout
> return isFollower() && state.hasLeader()
> &&
> role.getFollowerState().map(FollowerState::shouldWithholdVotes).orElse(false);
> }
> }
> {code}
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
