[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16036907#comment-16036907
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ROCKETMQ-203:
-----------------------------------------

Github user coveralls commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/109
  
    
    [![Coverage 
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11829934/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11829934)
    
    Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 38.733% when pulling 
**f19aa7096743dbb64ca79a25dbc2c63606877777 on 
Jaskey:ROCKETMQ-203-machineroom-nearby-strategy** into 
**0fe947173a85d8931b1068805713e89dbba4125a on apache:develop**.



> Support client to allocate message queue in machine room nearby priority
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ROCKETMQ-203
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-203
>             Project: Apache RocketMQ
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Jaskey Lam
>            Assignee: vongosling
>         Attachments: AVLCB%1XMJ}T_YXP[OPF){T.png
>
>
> As the picture shows, in multi-machine room acrtiture , the consumer may be 
> deployed in different IDC and so do the broker. 
> But the user may possiblly need to consumer message from its own IDC since it 
> is near and faster. But when problem occurs say all consumers in one IDC is 
> crashed, the messages can also be consumed by other consumers in other IDC.
> This is a very important feature for many users, but currently, if the user 
> needs this feature, they must implement their own allocate strategy which is 
> not easy and error prone.
> And, this feature should be be conflict to the existing allocate strategy 
> that means the user can still choose their better allocate strategy say 
> AVERAGE or AVERAGE_BY_CIRCLE, but nearby machine room will be supported 
> easily too.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to