Bilbosax edited a comment on issue #1064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/1064#issuecomment-767163762
@cristallium @carlosrovira Thanks for all the feedback. The endpoint I have
works, I just gave a fake address for security reasons. Unfortunately, I have
still not had any success today. I am choosing the simplest function in my API
which just returns a list of state names as an associative array. I don't get
much back in terms of an error response that makes a lot of sense. This is
what traces out:
```
org/apache/royale/utils/Language.js
Call was made, but failed - (mx.messaging.messages.ErrorMessage)
{0}={1},body,[object Object]
{0}={1},clientId,null
{0}={1},correlationId,27C88E55-FFDF-3221-9447-600F4182A908
{0}={1},destination,
{0}={1},headers,[object Object]
{0}={1},messageId,AD0825EB-4061-CD1F-3D62-600F41823E11
{0}={1},timeToLive,0
{0}={1},timestamp,0
org/apache/royale/utils/Language.js
```
But my biggest question is this. Because of rules regarding security with
Apple on my mobile apps, my original PHP API is on an SSL secured server and
all messages are sent by "https". I account for this in my config file which
is listed here:
```
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<services-config>
<services>
<service id="amfphp-flashremoting-service"
class="flex.messaging.services.RemotingService"
messageTypes="flex.messaging.messages.RemotingMessage">
<destination id="zend">
<channels>
<channel ref="my-zend"/>
</channels>
<properties>
<source>*</source>
</properties>
</destination>
</service>
</services>
<channels>
<channel-definition id="my-zend"
class="mx.messaging.channels.SecureAMFChannel">
<endpoint uri="https://wwwmywebsite.com/services/";
class="flex.messaging.endpoints.SecureAMFEndpoint"/>
</channel-definition>
</channels>
</services-config>
```
You can see at the bottom of this file that it specifically mentions a
"SecureAMFChannel" and "SecureAMFEndpoint." Since nobody seems to know if a
config file will get compiled correctly in Royale, do you know if there is
anything that I need to do special with mx RemoteObject to get it to "speak
securely"???
Or do you not think that this is the problem?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
