[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15378674#comment-15378674
]
Sravya Tirukkovalur commented on SENTRY-1390:
---------------------------------------------
Ok, synced up with Hao offline as it is was getting tricky to communicate over
jira. So here is the summary:
- URI handling, that is handling missing scheme or authority happens in
implies() in all paths (HMS and HS2), which is fixed in Sentry-1311.
- This patch is needed as one of the test is failing in the setup without this
change. But seems like this change does have impact else where. So I think it
is hard to access the regression risk with out knowing the full impact.
[~hahao] if you agree - how about lets
- Change the description of the jira, as this has nothing to do with HMS
binding?
- Make this test only change and investigate the setup failure as a follow on
if needed when we know the full context of the impact?
Thanks,
> Enabling usability of URI privileges for HMS binding
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SENTRY-1390
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1390
> Project: Sentry
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: URI
> Affects Versions: 1.8.0
> Reporter: Hao Hao
> Assignee: Hao Hao
> Attachments: SENTRY-1390.0.patch, SENTRY-1390.1.patch,
> SENTRY-1390.2.patch
>
>
> Enabling usability of URI privileges for HMS write protection, such that URI
> with no scheme or authority can be handled. e.g
> * GRANT ALL ON URI 'hdfs://namenode:XXX/path/to/table'
> * CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE foo LOCATION '/path/to/table'
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
