[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15546295#comment-15546295
]
Sravya Tirukkovalur commented on SENTRY-1486:
---------------------------------------------
Thanks for your contribution [~akolb]! I think it is important to get this in.
Although, I wonder what performance regression tests should we do to make sure
we do not regress seriously. We should definitely have all dbs as one
dimension. Do you have any thought on other test dimensions?
> Sentry should use repeatable-read consistency level
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SENTRY-1486
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1486
> Project: Sentry
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Sentry
> Affects Versions: 1.7.0, sentry-ha-redesign
> Reporter: Alexander Kolbasov
> Assignee: Alexander Kolbasov
> Attachments: SENTRY-1486.001.patch, SENTRY-1486.002.patch
>
>
> Currently Sentry uses the "read-committed" consistency level which is the
> default for the Datanucleus JDO library. This causes potential problems since
> the state visible to each transaction can actually see updates from another
> transactions, so it is very difficult to reason about any code that reads
> multiple pieces of data.
> Instead it should use repeatable read" consistency which guarantees that any
> transaction only sees the state at the beginning of a transaction plus any
> updates done within a transaction.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
