[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16140304#comment-16140304
]
Na Li commented on SENTRY-1885:
-------------------------------
[~spena] Should we close this one, and let SENTRY-1895 change its name (instead
of NotificationID, use something like "PathChangeUniqueId"), define unique
index on it, and put hash of the content there?
> Remove unused NOTIFICATION_ID from the SENTRY_PATH_CHANGE table
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SENTRY-1885
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1885
> Project: Sentry
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Sentry
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Sergio Peña
>
> I noticed while working on SENTRY-1803 that the SENTRY_PATH_CHANGE table has
> an unused column named NOTIFICATION_ID. I think this was used before to get
> the latest notification id processed, but now that process was moved to the
> SENTRY_HMS_NOTIFICATION_ID table.
> I think we should remove this unused column to avoid confusions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
