[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16140588#comment-16140588
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on SENTRY-1896:
-----------------------------------

Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12883585/SENTRY-1896.06.patch 
against master.

{color:red}Overall:{color} -1 due to 4 errors

{color:red}ERROR:{color} mvn test exited 1
{color:red}ERROR:{color} Failed: 
org.apache.sentry.provider.db.service.thrift.TestSentryServiceIntegration
{color:red}ERROR:{color} Failed: 
org.apache.sentry.provider.db.service.thrift.TestSentryServiceIntegration
{color:red}ERROR:{color} Failed: 
org.apache.sentry.provider.db.service.thrift.TestSentryServiceIntegration

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SENTRY-Build/3181/console

This message is automatically generated.

> Optimize retrieving roles for groups
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SENTRY-1896
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1896
>             Project: Sentry
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Sentry
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Arjun Mishra
>            Assignee: Arjun Mishra
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: SENTRY-1896.01.patch, SENTRY-1896.02.patch, 
> SENTRY-1896.03.patch, SENTRY-1896.04.patch, SENTRY-1896.05.patch, 
> SENTRY-1896.06.patch
>
>
> Right now when we get privileges from sentry, we pass in a provider like set 
> of groups. Then we create a MSentryGroup object for each group and then get 
> roles using the .getRoles() method. However, DataNucleus takes too long and 
> the fetch doesn't seem to be lazy. This is bad since we only need the 
> roleNames for the group and not the entire Role object.  
> Instead running a SQL like query and just getting roleNames will drastically 
> improve performance



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to