[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16149998#comment-16149998
]
Hadoop QA commented on SENTRY-1888:
-----------------------------------
Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12884761/SENTRY-1888.2.patch
against master.
{color:green}Overall:{color} +1 all checks pass
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} all tests passed
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SENTRY-Build/3210/console
This message is automatically generated.
> Sentry might not fetch all HMS duplicated events IDs when requested
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SENTRY-1888
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1888
> Project: Sentry
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Sentry
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Sergio Peña
> Assignee: Sergio Peña
> Attachments: SENTRY-1888.1.patch, SENTRY-1888.2.patch
>
>
> HMS does not guarantee that each notification has unique IDs. SENTRY-1803
> solved the issue with Sentry to handle those duplicated events IDs. However,
> HMS notifications with duplicated events IDs could appear late on the HMS
> side due to delay issues on the DB (especially on HMS HA mode). These events
> could not be fetched by Sentry if we already processed a duplicated event ID
> before.
> Example:
> 1. HMS 1 attempts to persist event ID = 1
> 2. HMS 2 attempts to persist event ID = 1
> 3. HMS 1 commits event ID = 1
> 4. Sentry fetches notifications >= 1 (bringing the event from HMS 1)
> 5. HMS 2 commits event ID = 1
> 6. Sentry fetches notifications >= 2 (no events are fetched)
> HMS 2 event ID = 1 is never fetched nor processed by Sentry.
> The above scenario could cause Sentry to be out-of-sync because of these
> events that were not committed on time.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
