[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16542661#comment-16542661
]
Willem Jiang commented on SCB-740:
----------------------------------
Hi Zheng,
It's could be great if you start the discussion in the mailing list by past
your proposal there. We normally use Jira to track the issue or tasks.
> Unified config handler of ServiceComb and other micro service frameworks
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SCB-740
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-740
> Project: Apache ServiceComb
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: ZhenJu
> Priority: Minor
>
> Hi, gang!
> I'm thinking about handling configs of both ServiceComb and other
> frameworks(like Istio), then provide a unified solution for config
> management, to support the hybrid solution scenario(like, user use
> ServiceComb and Istio at the same time).
> So the first thing to do, is to make sure that the chassis configs have a
> equivalent mapping of other frameworks. Currently I'm testing the rate limit
> configs between ServiceComb and Istio, it's working. I write a demo about
> this at [https://github.com/crystaldust/configcomb,] receive a chassis.yaml,
> read the Flowcontrol field, then convert it to Istio rate limit rules and
> apply the rules in a kubernetes cluster. It should also work the opposite way.
> By doing so, it is possible to provide a unified solution for config
> management, any ideas?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
