[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

tomer doron updated SHINDIG-1424:
---------------------------------

    Description: 
my POJO includes a getter named "getSingleton" which return an instance of the 
same class, due to the way org.apache.shindig.common.JsonUtil.getGetters is 
buit this is causing an endless loop when trying to serialize the POJO into 
JSON. unfortunately the "getSingleton" getter is required by another interface, 
thus,, i cannot simply rename it to overcome the naming convention issue. 

my proposed solution would be to introduce a way to hint JsonUtil.getGetters  
to ignore the getter, perhaps a new annotation or a magic phrase in 
JsonProperty annotation.

  was:
my POJO includes a getter named "getSinglton" which return an instance of the 
same class, due to the way org.apache.shindig.common.JsonUtil.getGetters is 
buit this is causing an endless loop when trying to serialize the POJO into 
JSON. unfortunately the "getSinglton" getter is required by another interface, 
thus,, i cannot simply rename it to overcome the naming convention issue. 

my proposed solution would be to introduce a way to hint JsonUtil.getGetters  
to ignore the getter, perhaps a new annotation or a magic phrase in 
JsonProperty annotation.


> endless loop while encoding POJOs to JSON
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SHINDIG-1424
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1424
>             Project: Shindig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: tomer doron
>
> my POJO includes a getter named "getSingleton" which return an instance of 
> the same class, due to the way org.apache.shindig.common.JsonUtil.getGetters 
> is buit this is causing an endless loop when trying to serialize the POJO 
> into JSON. unfortunately the "getSingleton" getter is required by another 
> interface, thus,, i cannot simply rename it to overcome the naming convention 
> issue. 
> my proposed solution would be to introduce a way to hint JsonUtil.getGetters  
> to ignore the getter, perhaps a new annotation or a magic phrase in 
> JsonProperty annotation.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to