[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17344960#comment-17344960
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-15407:
-------------------------------------
[~softwaredoug] may have thoughts on this matter as well; he wrote an excellent
[blog
post|https://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2018/02/20/edismax-and-multiterm-synonyms-oddities/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter]
on this.
Option 2 seems more practical than Option 1 since "sow" appears non-sensical
for a non-tokenized field any way.
Am I correct that the ramification of today's logic is that documents wouldn't
match at all if 100 is only present in the integer field -- let's say assuming
your example with "terminator 100"?
> eDismax sow=false doesn't work with string field types
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15407
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15407
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: query parsers
> Affects Versions: 8.8.2
> Reporter: Alessandro Benedetti
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently, the sow=false should not tokenize the input user query text and
> delegate to each field for query time text analysis.
> But what happens if one of the queries involved is not analyzed?
> For example, because it is a string field type?
> Terms are split and the query generated is broken:
> {code:java}
> assertU(adoc("id", "75", "trait_ss", "multi term"));
> public void testSplitOnWhitespace_stringField_shouldBuildSingleClause()
> throws Exception
> {
> assertJQ(req("qf", "trait_ss", "defType", "edismax", "q", "multi
> term", "sow", "false"),
> "/response/numFound==1", "/response/docs/[0]/id=='75'");
> String parsedquery;
> parsedquery = getParsedQuery(
> req("qf", "trait_ss", "q", "multi term", "defType", "edismax",
> "sow", "false", "debugQuery", "true"));
> assertThat(parsedquery, anyOf(containsString("((trait_ss:multi
> term))")));
> }
> {code}
> This test would be currently broken.
> The current parsed query is wrongly:
> (trait_ss:multi trait_ss:term)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
