[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17366843#comment-17366843
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-15487:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 498f9c4c42a0824eaaef1e312992a5eb41da4e3e in solr's branch
refs/heads/main from Chris M. Hostetter
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=solr.git;h=498f9c4 ]
SOLR-15487: fix CommonGramsFilter docs in ref-guide, add solr tests
The new test assertions have some comments related to unexpected behavior from
CommonGramsQueryFilter, currently being tracked in LUCENE-10007
> fix CommonGramsFilter docs in ref-guide, add solr tests
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15487
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15487
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter
> Assignee: Chris M. Hostetter
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-15487.patch
>
>
> the ref-guide docs for CommonGramsFilterFactory are currently incorrect as
> far as what tokens the filter produces, and are absent any
> explanation/discussion of the fact that it's really only useful if it's
> paired with CommonGramsQueryFilterFactory at query time.
> I also feel like we should go ahead and include some solr level tests to
> confirm that defining solr field types using these Factories in the
> index/query analyzers causes the expected behavior regarding phrase queries.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
