Jdurham2843 commented on a change in pull request #243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/243#discussion_r702334152



##########
File path: solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/Tuple.java
##########
@@ -87,10 +87,20 @@ public Tuple(String k1, Object v1, String k2, Object v2) {
    * @param fields map containing keys and values to be copied to this tuple
    */
   public Tuple(Map<String, ?> fields) {
-    // TODO Use bulk putAll operation that will properly size the map
-    // https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15480
-    for (Map.Entry<String, ?> entry : fields.entrySet()) {
-      put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
+    putAll(fields);
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * A copy constructor
+   * @param original Tuple that will be copied
+   */
+  public Tuple(Tuple original) {
+    this.putAll(original.fields);
+    if (original.fieldNames != null) {
+      this.fieldNames = new ArrayList<>(original.fieldNames);
+    }
+    if (original.fieldLabels != null) {
+      this.fieldLabels = new HashMap<>(original.fieldLabels);

Review comment:
       After taking some vacation time, I looked back at this, and I think my 
thought process above over complicated what we're trying to do here. Instead I 
think we should do the following:
   1. Give `other` precedence and do `putAll`s for `fields` and `fieldLabels`.
   2. Add individual `fieldName` items from `other` only if they aren't present 
in `this.fieldNames`.
   
   What do you think @cpoerschke ? The only downsides I could see would be if 
the user had a `field` that they didn't want externally serializable (ie: it 
doesn't have an associated `fieldName/fieldLabel`), then `other` could override 
that original state. That may be fine in this case. If a user wants more fine 
grain control, then they should probably just do the merge "by hand" instead of 
relying on `Tuple.merge`.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to