[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17433305#comment-17433305
 ] 

Timothy Potter commented on SOLR-15467:
---------------------------------------

Ugh! Yes, good catch, the first example in the ref guide should probably work 
OOTB ;-) I think you can just change the SQL example in the ref guide to add a 
LIMIT clause so the request goes through the {{/select}} handler and isn't so 
sensitive to the schema.

Yes, agreed, move the important syntax stuff to the top.

Honestly, I've never found much use for the worker stuff but then again, I 
mostly use SQL to make aggregation calls which hits the facet module, worker 
collections aren't very useful.

> Enhance Parallel SQL documentation (new operators, limitations, and so on ...)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-15467
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15467
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: documentation
>    Affects Versions: 7.7.1, 8.6.1, 8.8.1
>            Reporter: Aroop
>            Assignee: David Eric Pugh
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: RobustSQL
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In the ref guide sections for Parallel SQL, the section on Supported where 
> clauses seems to have a bug. The LIKE operator does not work at all.
>   
>  
> [https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_0/parallel-sql-interface.html#supported-where-operators]
>   
> {code:java}
> A simplistic LIKE can be used with a wildcard, such as field = 'sam*'. 
> {code}
> This may be fixed with little effort, but maybe we want to correct the 
> documentation till then to avoid user confusion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to