[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jan Høydahl resolved SOLR-15817.
--------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: main (9.0)
       Resolution: Fixed

> Ensure refGuide upgrade notes are completed before announcing a release
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-15817
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15817
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: documentation, release-scripts
>            Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>            Assignee: Jan Høydahl
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: main (9.0)
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Now when we have started publishing the RefGuide as part of the actual 
> release, we need to make sure it is ready. For the 8.11 release the 
> announcement went out with a broken link to refGuide, and when the guide was 
> published it lacked Upgrade Notes for 8.11.
> The proposal is as I wrote in 
> [dev@email|https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0gofszo79l96s0gv0yj6r4mp9np0zho]:
> {quote}
> Early on, right after cutting the branch, the RM files a blocker JIRA issue 
> with title e.g. "Complete Major changes and Upgrade Notes in RefGudie for 
> 9.1".
> Note that the RM will not need to be the one authoring the text (and not 
> Cassandra either), but the release will be blocked on *someone* stepping up.
> And of course we know that RCs can in theory still be voted upon while ref 
> guide is being completed, but that blocker JIRA must be resolved before 
> announcing the release.
> {quote}
> I plan to add two steps to RM process - 1) to file that blocker JIRA, and 2) 
> making sure the blocker is closed before announcing the release.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to