[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17494915#comment-17494915
]
Thomas Corthals commented on SOLR-3798:
---------------------------------------
{quote}I've been thinking about a related problem: reporting of what I'm
calling "undeclared explicit fields".
{quote}
I've run into this exact question when parsing Luke {{show=schema}} responses.
I ended up calling them "dynamic based fields" in my implementation, borrowing
from the {{dynamicBase}} attribute those fields have in {{show=all}} responses.
> copyField logic in LukeRequestHandler is primitive, doesn't work well with
> dynamicFields
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3798
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3798
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Schema and Analysis
> Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-3798.patch
>
>
> looking into SOLR-3795 i realized there is a much bigger problem with how
> LukeRequestHandler tries to get copyfield info for fields and dynamicFields
> the same way, and it just doesn't work.
> see the patch in SOLR-3795 for a commented out example of a test that still
> fails (ie: trying to get the "copySource" info for a dynamicField)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
