janhoy opened a new pull request, #799: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/799
I know that the big Lucene/Solr -> Solr cleanup was done some time ago. However, I did another search and came across some github links to `lucene-solr` repo (#798, #797). And in this PR I made some other (subjective) changes, mainly using "Solr" over "Lucene/Solr". The exception is when explicitly talking about Analyzers, where I left "Lucene/Solr" as-is. Please have a look. I suspect that @ctargett left quite a few on these "Lucene/Solr" brands on purpose, so I don't want to overrule those judgements, and will happily change back wher eyou guys feel I was too trigger happy. My thinking is that Solr users in the future will be less aware of Lucene, and saying `Lucene/Solr makes extensive use of MMapDirectory` does not really bring more value than `Solr makes extensive use of MMapDirectory`. In my head, "Lucene/Solr" is synonymous to the joint project and joint git era, while "Solr/Lucene" is more like XML/HTTP, i.e. Solr-on-top-of-lucene. While I have not tried to do such a change in this PR, it is an interesting thought. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
