HoustonPutman commented on PR #844: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/844#issuecomment-1121119336
> However, if we anticipate other guides (such as solr-operator and perhaps solr-exporter?) to be added later, I wonder if `/guide/solr/` would be a better "landing page" for the Ref Guide. Now, when you click the heading in top left corner of the guide, you are redirected to `/guide`, but if we also have `/guide/operator/` then it makes more sense to let that text link to `/guide/solr/`. Yeah, we should definitely update the buttons to go to `/guide/solr` (and `/guide/operator` when that exists). I don't think it's a huge issue to make the "landing page" default to the solr guide when users go to solr.apache.org/guide. We can make the intro-page better and give information and link to the Solr Operator guide as well, so that users can easily find it if that's what they are looking for. > Also, I discovered that the ref-guide places the JS, CSS etc in `/guide/_/` which will totally break down if we add other antora sites alongside it?? Or will the "operator guide" be a module of the same Solr Ref guide, pulled from a different git repo? Yep, it will be a module of the same Solr Ref guide, pulled in from the solr-operator repo. Not sure exactly how the workflow will go, but it will be done as intended in antora. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
