HoustonPutman commented on PR #1021: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1021#issuecomment-1254119922
Right now our docs are structured such that we are expecting users to upgrade from an outdated minor version to the `x.0` release of the next version. To me it would be clearer to have it like David is doing, but then we kind of need to either change the page names (which is fine because we are on antora now) so that `major-changes-in-solr-9.adoc` forwards requests too `solr-8-upgrade-notes.adoc` and have all 8.0-8.11 notes there. So that the anchor to 9.0 in that current page is not broken, we can have a small section at the end that links to `solr-9-upgrade-notes.adoc#9.0` or something like that. At this point we won't need to do anything for a major release, and links stay consistent even when the major version is cut. We can also trust people to look at all of the versions that they are skipping, even if it's on a different page. I can try to hack something together tomorrow if y'all want to see it to completion after that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
