[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17617425#comment-17617425
]
Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-11028:
----------------------------------------
bq. I'll have to stick with that.
Nothing in that spreadsheet is "set in stone". I put a good bit of thought
into them, but it's totally reasonable to propose changes if you think there's
a good case for something else.
That said, personally I think I agree with Eric on this one.
You're right that the whole verb-usage thing is technically unrelated to
"REST-fulness", but in my experience that convention around how to use
different HTTP verbs has become so common that users expect it most places they
go, whether it's what Fielding was trying to say or not.
I also find it intuitive personally, in most cases at least. e.g. GET requests
can't have a request body per the HTTP spec, so they can't send data, so it
makes sense for them to be "reads" or idempotent or whatever.
Was there a reason you liked "GET" for this one, Josh?
> Create a v2 API equivalent for REPLACENODE API
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-11028
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11028
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: SolrCloud, v2 API
> Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Priority: Major
>
> The REPLACENODE API is only implemented as part of the v1 collections API.
> There should be an equivalent call in the v2 paradigm.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
