[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17629579#comment-17629579
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-16524:
-------------------------------------
Why a separate file? Couldn't this be done simply with an URP to a designated
indexed field? We could also employ index sorting on this field.
> Index time hash partitioning
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16524
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16524
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Joel Bernstein
> Priority: Major
>
> Both Streaming Expressions and Spark-Solr currently rely on query time hash
> partitioning using the HashQParserPlugin. The query time hash partitioning,
> although extremely flexible, is very slow when it builds its initial filters.
> This ticket will add an indexing time hash partitioner that Streaming
> Expressions and Spark-solr will both be able to use.
> When this ticket is complete I'll also update the ParallelStream and
> Spark-Solr to be able to use the index time partitioning rather than the
> HashQParserPlugin.
> This is a stepping stone towards much more performant parallel distributed
> joins.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
