[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17697628#comment-17697628
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-16487:
-------------------------------------

Looking at the last two comments, it's clear you have two JIRA accounts not 
that you've become a committer.  I recommend asking INFRA to merge them (see 
INFRA-23707 as an example).

Wanted to mention that I think it'd be nicer if PULL replicas would replicate 
based on a notification from the leader on a commit / open-searcher.  Polling 
is to be avoided in general, especially at scale.

> Improve calculation of poll interval for replicas
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-16487
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16487
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: replication (java)
>    Affects Versions: 9.0, 8.11.2
>            Reporter: Justin Sweeney
>            Assignee: Justin Sweeney
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently the polling for replication is fairly simply, but can lead to 
> polling too often. As an example if you had the following config for commits:
> {code:java}
> <autoCommit>
>     <maxTime>15000</maxTime>
>     <openSearcher>false</openSearcher>
> </autoCommit>
> <autoSoftCommit>
>     <maxTime>60000</maxTime>
> </autoSoftCommit> {code}
> The current logic would setup polling to be half of the autoCommit time, so 
> poll every 7.5 seconds. However since a new searcher isn't opened, there will 
> only be changes reflected every 60 seconds on the leader. We can make this 
> logic a bit smarter knowing that the replication handler won't reflect 
> changes until a new searcher is opened.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to