[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17710232#comment-17710232
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya edited comment on SOLR-16739 at 4/10/23 5:00 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Off-topic]
bq. 42M ./gcs-repository
bq. 12M ./s3-repository
I think we should get rid of both of these, and adopt Apache JCloud project. As
a side-benefit, we'll get Azure storage as well, without needing several
different modules.
was (Author: ichattopadhyaya):
[Off-topic]
bq. 42M ./gcs-repository
bq. 12M ./s3-repository
I think we should get rid of both of these, and adopt Apache JClouds project.
As a side-benefit, we'll get Azure storage as well, without needing several
different modules.
> Introduce Solr Kubernetes Module
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16739
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16739
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: module - kubernetes
> Reporter: Houston Putman
> Priority: Major
>
> As described in
> [SIP-18|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/SIP-18%3A+A+Solr+Kubernetes+Module+for+native+integration],
> a Kubernetes module for Solr would help users run much more natively, when
> used with the Solr Operator.
> This is an umbrella issue and each functionality of the Kubernetes Module
> will be handled in child issues.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
