[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17729921#comment-17729921
 ] 

Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-16838 at 6/7/23 4:04 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, it has always been commented out. For reproducing the issue, the index has 
also been deleted multiple times and rebuilt against the same schema. Also made 
sure the dynamic field "*" doesn't exist either to eliminate the possibility of 
_root_ being treated as a dynamic field.  


was (Author: [email protected]):
Yes, it has always been commented out. For reproducing the issue, the index has 
also been deleted multiple times and rebuilt against the same schema. Also made 
sure the dynamic field "*" doesn't exist either to eliminate the possibility of 
_{_}root_{_} being treated as a dynamic field.  

> Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-16838
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: SearchComponents - other
>    Affects Versions: 8.11.1
>            Reporter: Rahul Goswami
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: RTG, RealTimeGet, atomicupdate
>
> Started experiencing slowness with updates in production after upgrading from 
> Solr 7.7.2 to 8.11.1. Upon comparing the performance it turns out that 
> indexing 20 million docs via atomic updates through the same client program 
> (running 15 parallel threads indexing in batches of 1000) takes below time:
>  
> Solr 7 : 78 mins
> Solr 8:  370 mins 
>  
> Environment details:
> - Java 11 on Windows server
> - Xms1536m Xmx3072m
> - Indexing client code running 15 parallel threads indexing in batches of 1000
> - using SimpleFSDirectoryFactory  (since Mmap doesn't  quite work well on 
> Windows for our index sizes which commonly run north of 1 TB) 
>  
> Looking at the thread dump, the bottleneck seems to be RealTimeGet and I can 
> see that Solr 7 takes a different code path than Solr 8. Note that the 
> performance of regular updates (non-atomic) is still pretty good on Solr 8 
> completing in < 1 hour for the same 20 million data set. 
>  
> Sharing the indexing code, solrconfig, schema and thread dumps in the link 
> below:
> [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1q2DPNTYQEU6fi3NeXIKJhaoq3KPnms0h?usp=sharing]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to