[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17807343#comment-17807343
]
Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-17066:
----------------------------------------
bq. The commit messages here speak of "data store" yet we agreed "collection"
was better.
Hmm...I assume you're referring to the discussion
[here|https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2177#issuecomment-1883191148]? Not
sure how I missed those 🤔; will amend, sorry about that.
(I have a bit more to say on the terminology/naming discussion, but let's
continue that at the GH link above.)
> Deprecate and remove core URLs in HttpSolrClient and friends
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-17066
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17066
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: SolrJ
> Reporter: Jason Gerlowski
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 2h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently, URL-driven SolrClients can consume a base URL that either ends in
> an API-version specific path ("/solr" for v1 APIs, "/api" for v2), or in the
> full path to a specific core or collection ("/solr/techproducts").
> The latter option causes a number of problems in practice. It prevents the
> client from being used for any "admin" requests or for requests to other
> cores or collections. (Short of running a regex on
> {{SolrClient.getBaseURL}}, it's hard to even tell which of these restrictions
> a given client might have.) And lastly, specifying such core/collection URL
> makes it tough mix and match v1 and v2 API requests within the same client
> (see SOLR-17044).
> We should give SolrJ users some similar way to default collection/cores
> without any of these downsides. One approach would be to extend the
> {{withDefaultCollection}} pattern currently established in
> {{CloudHttp2SolrClient.Builder}}.
> (IMO we should also revisit the division of responsibilities between
> SolrClient and SolrRequest implementations - maybe clients shouldn't,
> directly at least, be holding on to request-specific settings like the
> core/collection at all. But that's a much larger concern that we might not
> want to wade into here. See SOLR-10466 for more on this topic.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
