cpoerschke commented on PR #1999: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1999#issuecomment-1898950454
> Feels like what we should be doing is having Solr 10 target Java 17 since Lucene 10 will require it, and then this code goes on Solr 10, but not on Solr 9. This lets us have some more time to experiment with out dealing with the headaches of supporting an official release in the 9.x line (backcompat and the rest)....?? I concur. Also a nice motivation for targeting Java 17 i.e. specific example of functionality that it would unlock. And in the meantime "independent plugin" approaches remain a possibility in the community, perhaps even in the https://github.com/apache/solr-sandbox if someone wanted to pursue that (haven't checked how that is built, just kinda "name dropping" `solr-sandbox` here). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
