[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17812443#comment-17812443
]
James Dyer commented on SOLR-16367:
-----------------------------------
I was wondering if any thought was made to use *java.net.http.HttpClient*
instead of the Jetty Http Client? If the functionality is adequate, we could
reduce the dependencies that SolrJ brings in.
> Umbrella: Migrate away from Apache HttpClient.
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16367
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16367
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: main (10.0)
>
>
> This is an umbrella issue to migrate away from using Apache HttpClient to
> alternatives, namely Jetty HttpClient. Supporting both is hard to maintain,
> and furthermore Jetty supports HTTP 2. Sub-tasks and linked issues will
> accomplish this. When this umbrella is done, Apache HttpClient will not be
> used in solr-core or solrj. Modules may use it only if required by
> dependencies. HttpSolrClient (which uses Apache HttpClient) can still exist
> but in its own opt-in SolrJ module.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
