[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17845446#comment-17845446
 ] 

Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-17256:
----------------------------------------

+1 to getting rid of these, if possible.

I find LBSolrClient's use of these methods particularly egregious.  Many people 
reuse SolrRequest instances, so having LBSolrClient (and the "cloud" clients, 
by extension) quietly mutate instances feels like a real anti-pattern.  (I may 
create a more targeted JIRA ticket to deal with this particular usage, if no 
one plans on removing them altogether in the near future?)

> Remove SolrRequest.getBasePath setBasePath
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-17256
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17256
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SolrJ
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: newdev
>
> SolrRequest has a getBasePath & setBasePath.  The naming is poor; it's the 
> URL base to the Solr node like "http://localhost:8983/solr";.  It's only 
> recognized by HttpSolrClient; LBSolrClient (used by CloudSolrClient) ignores 
> it and will in fact mutate the passed in request to its liking, which is 
> rather ugly because it means a request cannot be used concurrently if the 
> user wants to.  But moreover I think there's a conceptual discordance of 
> placing this concept on SolrRequest given that some clients want to route 
> requests to nodes *they* choose.  I propose removing this from SolrRequest 
> and instead adding a method specific to HttpSolrClient.  Almost all existing 
> usages of setBasePath immediately execute the request on an HttpSolrClient, 
> so should be easy to change.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to