[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18030728#comment-18030728
 ] 

Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-17161:
------------------------------------

Super slim client is good! Might be controversial but I still think we should 
consider shading some of the most frequently conflicting libs in solrj, like 
Jackson. We could have a non-shaded and a shaded version in maven.

> Separate out a solrj-jetty artifact (10.0)
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-17161
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17161
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: clients - java
>            Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: main (10.0)
>
>
> Given we have a native JDK based client in SOLR-599, we can separate out all 
> {{Http2SolrClient}} and freiends with their jetty-client dependencies into a 
> separate artifact {{{}solrj-jetty{}}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to