[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18048218#comment-18048218
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-17136:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 917e38447b9555ba9bc53d8d8295e78dd6f5b5c1 in solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_10x from Pierre Salagnac
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=solr.git;h=917e38447b9 ]

SOLR-17136: Fix SystemInfoResponse when Solr runs in standalone mode. (#3989)

This is a follow-up of #3955 to fix parsing of result from /admin/info/system 
when Solr run in non-cloud mode.

(cherry picked from commit ac3d79d18ed660c25aaf0f7024beb12703052dc8)


> Replace most uses of GenericSolrRequest in Solr code
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-17136
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17136
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SolrJ
>    Affects Versions: 10.0
>            Reporter: Jason Gerlowski
>            Assignee: Jason Gerlowski
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: newdev, pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 10.1
>
>          Time Spent: 11.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> GenericSolrRequest, a SolrRequest implementation that can be used to make 
> requests to arbitrary endpoints via a specified HTTP method and path, is used 
> in 50-60 places through Solr's codebase.
> In most of these places, it's used as a "last resort" because SolrJ doesn't 
> offer a more specific SolrRequest implementation that covers the API the 
> developer wanted to use.
> Where this is the case, we should fill these gaps in SolrJ with new 
> SolrRequest implementations and remove the usage of GSR.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to