[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18059531#comment-18059531
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-18111:
-------------------------------------
Sorry; I confused this with trie numerics... which it is but with different
code that's even older
> Remove org.apache.solr.legacy.Legacy* Field Types
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-18111
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18111
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Eric Pugh
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We have a set of various legacy field types like LegacyLongField and
> LegacyInField that should not be used in favour of better implementations
> like LongPoint and IntPoint.
> One nuance is that there may be value in keeping these legacy fields, and if
> so, then the right answer is to undeprecate them. And instead leave the
> annotation that you SHOULD be using IntPoint. However, considering our ref
> guide section on "How to pick numeric types" doesn't even mention these:
> [https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/indexing-guide/field-type-definitions-and-properties.html#choosing-appropriate-numeric-types]
> then I think they are fair game to be removed.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
