[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18060923#comment-18060923
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-16525:
-------------------------------------
It seems to me that one could reasonably choose any combination of a "micro
benchmark" or a "load testing / macro benchmark" to use for performance
regression testing (this JIRA). And furthermore, if we started with
solr/benchmark specifically, would it be that hard to add concurrent load if we
wanted to benchmark something that warranted it?
BTW I don't consider "luceneutil" as macro unless it's gained new abilities
lately to do concurrent load. Or I'm forgetful on this point.
I do understand that JMH has some interesting capabilities that are moot, not
needed, for performance regression reporting.
> Periodic performance benchmarking
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16525
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16525
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2023-01-14 17-39-42.png, Screenshot from
> 2023-02-08 04-15-34.png, image-2022-11-09-13-23-21-131.png,
> logs-stress-facets-local.json-b9f5f9ffed8e0c1af679911db6af698d18ab8fe1.zip,
> logs-stress-facets-local.json-ebc823a599160914f7f0f2694f64a53d9cd20268.zip,
> periodic-benchmarks.odp, periodic-benchmarks.pdf
>
>
> This issue is about periodic performance testing of Solr commits against
> pre-written suites of performance tests.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
