hossman commented on PR #4500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/4500#issuecomment-4634461197
I don't know if this is a good idea or a terrible idea, but it just occurred
to me -- should we do something like...
```
// a test can configure @RandomizeSSL(0.0) or with 1.0, and we must honor
that.
final String sslProp = System.getProperty("tests.ssl");
if ("true".equals(sslProp)) {
assumeFalse("tests.ssl=true but test does not support SSL", ssl == 0.0)
return new SSLTestConfig(true, useClientAuth);
} else if ("false".equals(sslProp)) {
assumeFalse("tests.ssl=false but test requires SSL", ssl == 1.0)
return new SSLTestConfig(false, false);
}
```
?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
