[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18095331#comment-18095331
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-15845:
-------------------------------------
It probably is "wrong" to continue to use luceneMatchVersion for Solr matters
due to its name, but the absence of a Solr layer alternative has effectively
+forced+ us to continue to use this, as we occasionally want a recourse for an
upgrading user. I'd rather we not have two compatibility toggles here; just
one is simpler & adequate.
> Solr needs its own Version class
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15845
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15845
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 9.0
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Assignee: Jan Høydahl
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 9.0
>
> Time Spent: 2h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> From 9.0 on, Solr may release with a different version number than the Lucene
> it depends on, since Lucene is just another jar dependency now.
> Several places in our code base we either print a version based on Lucene
> Version, or make other decisions based on it. It's still the correct Version
> to use for index compatibility and analysis plugins, but other places we need
> a {{SolrVersion}} to replace it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
