adityamparikh commented on PR #175:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-mcp/pull/175#issuecomment-5357682631

   Added an end-to-end test and closed a duplicate PR in this one's favour.
   
   **Duplicate:** I opened #185 against the same bug without spotting this PR — 
my duplicate check
   searched issues, not pull requests. #185 is now closed, and issue #182 
(which I filed for the
   same defect) points here.
   
   Comparing the two implementations, **this one is better** and is what should 
merge. It anchors on
   the full path `facet_counts/facet_fields/<field>`, so a key named 
`facet_fields` appearing
   anywhere else in a response cannot be misread. #185 matched the bare key at 
any depth. #185 also
   covered `facet_queries` and `facet_intervals`, but that turned out to be 
dead weight — Solr emits
   both as JSON objects, which already decode correctly through `convertObject`.
   
   **Ported across (e4d0646):** the one thing #185 had that this PR didn't — an 
integration test
   against real Solr via Testcontainers.
   
   The existing `JsonResponseParserTest` pins decoding at the parser boundary 
with a hand-written
   payload, which is the right place for it. But that leaves one assumption 
unverified: that a real
   Solr genuinely emits `[]` for a zero-hit facet. If Solr ever emitted `{}` 
instead, those unit
   tests would keep passing while the bug they guard had stopped existing in 
that form. The new test
   closes that gap by faceting a filter designed to match nothing and asserting 
an empty facet map
   comes back.
   
   Verified rather than assumed: reverting only the `JsonResponseParser` change 
on this branch and
   re-running makes the new test fail with `java.lang.ClassCastException`. With 
the fix it passes.
   Full build is **378 tests, 0 failures, 7 skipped**.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to