[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18107985#comment-18107985
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-15465:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 40b81d9d251be95af1931501c4f08be866c8a0bc in solr's branch
refs/heads/branch_10x from Jan Høydahl
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=solr.git;h=40b81d9d251 ]
SOLR-15465: Remove 3 dangling LICENSE/NOTICE files missed by #4793 (#4801)
(cherry picked from commit 7ad4bbf6a914551c92cd6af88b2f12a29637e17a)
> Do not require LICENSE and NOTICE files for test-dependencies
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15465
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15465
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Assignee: Jan Høydahl
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 1.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Our current build (and the ant build before it) checks that every single jar,
> even test dependencies, have a .sha1 file in licenses/ folder along with a
> LICENSE file and optinally a NOTICE file.
> However, according to [https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html] we only
> need to supply LICENSE/NOTICE files for bits we ship, either as copy/pasted
> source code in the source dist or jar deps in the binary dist.
> Thus, I think we can stop shipping those LICENSE/NOTICE files for deps that
> we never distribute. Perhaps the sha1 files should remain for extra
> validation of binaries pulled from mvn, I don't know.
> [~dsmiley] [~dweiss]
> This probably goes for the Lucene build too.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
