liangkaiwen opened a new pull request, #4919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/4919

   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18424
   
   <!--
   _(If you are a project committer then you may remove some/all of the 
following template.)_
   
   Before creating a pull request, please file an issue in the ASF Jira system 
for Solr:
   
   * https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SOLR
   
   For something minor (i.e. that wouldn't be worth putting in release notes), 
you can skip JIRA.
   To create a Jira issue, you will need to create an account there first.
   
   The title of the PR should reference the Jira issue number in the form:
   
   * SOLR-####: <short description of problem or changes>
   
   SOLR must be fully capitalized. A short description helps people scanning 
pull requests for items they can work on.
   
   Properly referencing the issue in the title ensures that Jira is correctly 
updated with code review comments and commits. -->
   
   
   # Description
   
   Solr 10 introduced Binary Quantization, however the recall drop-off is 
fairly sharp when used as-is. This can be partially offset by oversampling 
(retrieving more total documents from HNSW graph) and reranking (using raw 
non-quantized vector values from .vec). While reranking is possible through the 
standard Solr reranking feature, it is cumbersome syntactically and easy to get 
wrong. This aims to offer a cleaner and performant oversampling/reranking 
natively in the KNN query parser
   
   # Solution
   
   Code mostly written by Claude Opus 5
   
   * Add a param 'rerankOversample' to the KNN query parser. This param accepts 
a positive integer and is optional (default value=1 when not provided).  
Behaviorally, this value is a multiplier on the existing topK * efSearch, and 
if it is > 1 do a rerank stage after search down to topK only.
   * Validation of rerankOversample. The provided value should be >= 1 and 
oversample should not be applied to BYTE encoded vectors
   * Uses generic RescoreTopNQuery and passes the similarity function 
explicitly, because the lucene rerank vector function can hit a 
NullPointerException when similarity function is not explicitly defined (as a 
binary quantized field definition might not).
   * 
   
   **Latency / Recall Benchmarks**
   To be added soon
   
   # Tests
   
   * Manually querying
   * Unit tests
   * Benchmarking
   
   # Checklist
   
   Please review the following and check all that apply:
   
   - [ ] I have reviewed the guidelines for [How to 
Contribute](https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and my 
code conforms to the standards described there to the best of my ability.
   - [ ] I have created a Jira issue and added the issue ID to my pull request 
title.
   - [ ] I have given Solr maintainers 
[access](https://help.github.com/en/articles/allowing-changes-to-a-pull-request-branch-created-from-a-fork)
 to contribute to my PR branch. (optional but recommended, not available for 
branches on forks living under an organisation)
   - [ ] I have developed this patch against the `main` branch.
   - [ ] I have run `./gradlew check`.
   - [ ] I have added tests for my changes.
   - [ ] I have added documentation for the [Reference 
Guide](https://github.com/apache/solr/tree/main/solr/solr-ref-guide)
   - [ ] I have added a [changelog 
entry](https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-docs/changelog.adoc) for my 
change
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to